The Chance for Food and Peace in Syria

This article was written by Wiliam Lambers and published in The Hill. Click here to read the article on The Hill’s website. Photo above: World Food Programme.

For Syria to survive as a nation, they must have food. The farmers must be able to grow and harvest their crops in peace.   

But the four-year civil war has destroyed food production, the very heart of any nation. The fighting has left innocent civilians to starve.

That is why the UN World Food Programme (WFP) is calling for a ceasefire throughout Syria. It’s time to put down the guns and defeat the enemy of hunger.

WFP, the largest hunger relief organization, has been feeding close to 7 million of Syria’s war victims.  

Ertharin Cousin, the director of WFP, pleads, “Farmers need peace to harvest and to move their produce to markets. I am urging all sides to allow this to happen.”

The international community must rally around food for peace in Syria. The fighting, which has increasingly targeted civilians, must be brought to an end.  

An immediate ceasefire can accomplish several things. First, it can allow the farmers to do the nation’s most essential work of providing a food supply.

Secondly, humanitarian aid agencies can reach those blocked off by the fighting. The WFP and other partner agencies can provide food and other life-saving supplies for the besieged population. They need consistent access to those in need.

Any pause in the fighting can help create the conditions needed to build a lasting peace. As U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry says the goal is a “transition from the Assad regime towards a government that represents all the people and can repair this extraordinary damage to Syria, unite the country, protect all minorities, and provide a legitimate future.”

All of Syria can immediately unite to grow food. The first step is the ceasefire.

As Cousin warns, “Without a humanitarian pause by all sides, providing unhindered access to Syrian food and opening up corridors for transport, people will still go hungry despite a good harvest, and prices for food will remain high.”

No peace can be built in Syria on empty stomachs.  Farming must resume to rebuild the nation’s food supplies. Aid from the World Food Programme and others must reach those in need.

One of the most critical foods is a peanut paste called Plumpy’Doz, which prevents malnutrition in small children. Lack of food can cause lasting physical and mental damage in small children. It’s a race against time to provide the Plumpy’Doz and other life-saving foods.

The international community must support WFP and other relief agencies with enough funding.  It’s difficult to sustain one of the largest humanitarian missions in history.

One of the more innovative ways to distribute the food aid has been through the use of vouchers for Syrian refugees in Jordan and other countries. These vouchers allow the refugees to buy food in local markets. But WFP needs funding to continue this program, which benefits refugees and host nations.

During the First World War the Hejaz Railway, which ran through Syria, was destroyed by fighting. When the WFP first came into existence, one of their initial projects was to provide food to Syrians in exchange for rebuilding that railroad.

We would like to see such food for work projects today to rebuild Syria from the ashes. There are millions of Syrians who long for that peaceful day. We can start on that road. But first the guns of Syria must go silent. Farmers must harvest again. Food for peace in Syria must prevail.

Lambers is the author of Ending World Hunger and the Road to Peace. His writings have been published by the New York Times, History News Network, Cincinnati Enquirer and the Cleveland Plain Dealer.


2 thoughts on “The Chance for Food and Peace in Syria

  1. This article is enlightening regarding the UN’s efforts to get food to civilians who are marginalized and literally starving to death as war victims in Syria. The article is pretty straight and forward regarding the urgent need for peace in Syria from a humanitarian food crisis. Ironically, Lambers refers to Senator Kerry’s over simplified notion that “a transition from the Assad regime towards a government that represent all of the people…” as the political and military goal that we also lead to food security for the the civilian population. My concern is that with the increasing involvement of extremist foreign fighters such as ISIL using Syria as a base of operation, is it realistic that even if the Assad regime crumbles and is displaced that food security will be restored to local Syrians? I’m also curious what the author of this blog feels about the WFP “work for food” proposal? It seems to me that such a program could lead to the exploitation of war victims, when the infrastructure can be built by professional contractors in a more strategic public/private post-war rebuilding approach? Thanks for sharing this ongoing discussion concerning the need to relieve this tragic case of human suffering, and outlining some of the UN’s current efforts to do so under such dangerous conditions come what may ~

    Liked by 1 person

  2. You’ve touched on important points. My goal with sharing is to raise awareness about the unfortunate humanitarian crisis going on in Syria. Political restructuring is certainly necessary. I’m not sure what the work for food proposal is exactly, but you’ve touched on some important points about it! Thanks for sharing!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s